<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Puffy Nipples Confuse Shy Girl (Pics!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlynipples.com/puffy-nipples-confuse-shy-girl-pics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlynipples.com/puffy-nipples-confuse-shy-girl-pics</link>
	<description>dedicated to only the finest, amateur female nipple pictures and movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:29:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.onlynipples.com/puffy-nipples-confuse-shy-girl-pics/comment-page-1#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlynipples.com/?p=257#comment-576</guid>
		<description>A few things:

1.  @plimbleton is an idiot.

2.  This woman&#039;s puffies look legitimate.  You can see the difference in the texture of her areolas.  I think she had no need to be pumped up.

3.  Yes, puffies are pretty special, even today.  Sure, you can find them easily by Googling for &quot;puffies&quot;.  But I think they&#039;re still rare.  If @plimbleton could get our and date women, like other men instead of just looking at porn, you&#039;ll find that puffies aren&#039;t very common.

4.  I&#039;m sorry, &quot;Nipples Pics&quot;, the photo of the woman&#039;s pussy doesn&#039;t show she has a large clit.  It shows she has beautiful, large labia.  She may have a large clit, but it&#039;s covered by the labia and not shown in that photo.  We&#039;d all love to see it, though.  Please use the correct terminology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few things:</p>
<p>1.  @plimbleton is an idiot.</p>
<p>2.  This woman&#8217;s puffies look legitimate.  You can see the difference in the texture of her areolas.  I think she had no need to be pumped up.</p>
<p>3.  Yes, puffies are pretty special, even today.  Sure, you can find them easily by Googling for &#8220;puffies&#8221;.  But I think they&#8217;re still rare.  If @plimbleton could get our and date women, like other men instead of just looking at porn, you&#8217;ll find that puffies aren&#8217;t very common.</p>
<p>4.  I&#8217;m sorry, &#8220;Nipples Pics&#8221;, the photo of the woman&#8217;s pussy doesn&#8217;t show she has a large clit.  It shows she has beautiful, large labia.  She may have a large clit, but it&#8217;s covered by the labia and not shown in that photo.  We&#8217;d all love to see it, though.  Please use the correct terminology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plimbleton</title>
		<link>http://www.onlynipples.com/puffy-nipples-confuse-shy-girl-pics/comment-page-1#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>plimbleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlynipples.com/?p=257#comment-567</guid>
		<description>also, the &quot;erect&quot; photo has more than likely been achieved by a pump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, the &#8220;erect&#8221; photo has more than likely been achieved by a pump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plimbleton</title>
		<link>http://www.onlynipples.com/puffy-nipples-confuse-shy-girl-pics/comment-page-1#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>plimbleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlynipples.com/?p=257#comment-566</guid>
		<description>well, they may have been classic show stopper &quot;WAY-BACK-IN-THE-DAY&quot;, but right here and now, whats the fuss. maybe the camera guy is getting something out of it, but not her sex?
(yes yes yes, i know, she&#039;s probably a very nice lady)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, they may have been classic show stopper &#8220;WAY-BACK-IN-THE-DAY&#8221;, but right here and now, whats the fuss. maybe the camera guy is getting something out of it, but not her sex?<br />
(yes yes yes, i know, she&#8217;s probably a very nice lady)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

